Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad on Tuesday told Mark Zuckerberg that it is problematic when Facebook employees on record abuse Prime Minister Narendra Modi while still working and managing important positions in Facebook India. It is doubly problematic when the bias of individuals becomes an inherent bias of the platform.
In a letter to Zuckerberg, Prasad wrote, “It is problematic when Facebook employees are on record abusing the Prime Minister and senior Cabinet Ministers of India while still working in Facebook India and managing important positions. It is doubly problematic when the bias of individuals becomes an Inherent bias of the platform.”
Prasad stated that “it is unacceptable when political biases of individuals impinge on the freedom of speech of millions of people”. He added, “…it seems that these deeply entrenched vested interests aren’t satisfied with the shrinking space for one side of the spectrum in India and want to throttle it completely. The spate of recent anonymous, source-based reports is nothing but an internal power struggle within your company for ideological hegemony. No other logic can explain how facts are being spun by the selective leaks from within your company to try to portray an alternate reality.”
He said that this interference in India’s political process through gossip, whispers and innuendo is condemnable. “This collusion of a group of Facebook employees with international media is giving a free run to malevolent vested interests to cast aspersions on the democratic process of our great democracy. I would like to point out that there have also been multiple instances recently where Facebook has been used by anarchic & radical elements whose sole aim is to destroy social order, to recruit people and to assemble them for violence. However, we are yet to see any meaningful action against such elements. Is this action also held back by the same vested interest groups who have an incentive in stoking political violence and Instability in India?”
Prasad asserted that a major issue with Facebook is the outsourcing of fact-checking to third-party fact-checkers. “How can Facebook absolve itself of its responsibility to protect users from misinformation and instead out-source this to shady organizations with no credibility. We have seen in India that right from the assessors for on-boarding fact-checkers to the tact-checkers themselves harbour publicly expressed political biases. Regularly vigilant volunteers on social media have to fact-check the fact-checkers) Even after onboarding so many fact-checkers, lot of misinformation related to COVID-19 and its aftermath went unchecked,” he said.
“How can an organisation like Facebook be oblivious to these realities, A transnational digital platform with a wide user base cannot remain immune to lo-cal sensitivities either. A certain act which may be acceptable as per social norms in a particular country but many not be conducive to the social norms of another country. Facebook Community Guidelines must acknowledge this aspect of diversity and respect it To respect the social, religious, cultural and linguistic diversity of India, Facebook should put in place country-specific Community Guidelines. Facebook has been a novel experiment in democratizing the expression of people and giving a platform to millions of ordinary citizens to freely express their views, connect, build communities, associate and communicate. I hope that you are cognizant that this experiment should not be allowed to be hijacked by a vested lobby that abhors free speech and tries to enforce one world view and rejects diversify,” he concluded.
He also wrote, “I am writing this letter to raise serious concerns, some of which we have also raised in the past with senior officials of Facebook. I have often heard you and your senior management talk about the general benefits of connectivity, and more specifically in the context of your products, to the global community.”
“Facebook’s stated mission is to give people the power to build communities and bring the world closer. The global scale achieved by the products of the Facebook group makes it one of the prime movers in this goal of achieving connected communities across the world. However, what we have seen in the last few months goes contrary to achieving the stated goals of Facebook,” he also said.
“I have been informed that in the run-up to 2019 General Elections in India, there was a concerted effort by Facebook India management to not just delete pages or substantially reduce their reach but also offer no recourse or right of appeal to affected people who are supportive of the right-of-centre ideology. I am also aware that dozens of emails written to Facebook management received no response,” he added.
“The above-documented cases of bias and inaction are seemingly a direct outcome of the dominant political beliefs of individuals in your Facebook India team. As a transnational digital platform, Facebook must not only be fair and neutral but also visibly seen to be so, to users of diverse beliefs and ideologies. Individuals working in any organization may have their individual likes or dislikes, but that must not have any bearing on the public policies and performance of the organization,” he further said.